{"id":8040,"date":"2020-08-24T12:18:05","date_gmt":"2020-08-24T16:18:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/?p=8040"},"modified":"2021-09-13T15:24:03","modified_gmt":"2021-09-13T19:24:03","slug":"tzac-carter-center","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/tzac-carter-center\/","title":{"rendered":"USA ex rel. TZAC, Inc. v. The Carter Center, Inc."},"content":{"rendered":"
In this False Claims Act lawsuit, the Zionist Advocacy Center alleged that the Carter Center provided material support to terrorist groups, contrary to its USAID certification, when it included Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine as part of various conflict resolution meetings. After the case was unsealed in 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice moved to dismiss the case. In May 2018, the court granted the motion and dismissed it. This case raised issues around the U.S. Supreme Court\u2019s 2010 decision in\u00a0Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project,<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>which said Congress can prohibit services and technical advice and assistance as material support of terrorism, even when it is intended to reduce conflict.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n In November 2015 the Zionist Advocacy Center (TZAC) filed a\u00a0complaint<\/a>\u00a0against the Carter Center under the U.S.\u00a0False Claims Act (FCA)<\/a>, which allows whistleblowers to seek enforcement of U.S. law. The case, United States of America ex rel TZAC v. the Carter Center, Case: 1:15-cv-02001, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The complaint alleged that by hosting conflict resolution meetings attended by Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), both designated as terrorist groups by the U.S., and serving water, fruit and cookies, the Carter Center provided material support to terrorist groups, contrary to a certification it made to USAID. The Department of Justice (DOJ) moved to dismiss the case<\/a>, saying that TZAC\u2019s claims \u201care without legal basis\u2026\u201d On May 31, 2018 the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC\u00a0granted the motion<\/a>\u00a0and the case was dismissed.<\/p>\r\n TZAC\u2019s legal argument was that the Carter Center, a USAID grantee, defrauded the government because it falsely certified in its grant agreement it had not provided material support to listed groups. The complaint did not allege that USAID funds were used to support the meetings TZAC cited. TZAC said the Carter Center received over $30 million from USAID between 2010 and 2015 and should pay $91,716,000, plus costs and \u201can appropriate award\u201d to TZAC.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n The False Claims Act is\u00a0a U.S. law that imposes liability on those that knowingly defraud government programs. Private parties, called \u201crelators,\u201d can bring these suits on the government\u2019s behalf. Complaints filed under the FCA are automatically sealed for 60 days while the government investigates the claims and decides whether or not they merit further action. During this time the defendant (and the public) has no notice that a case has been filed. The court can extend the sealing period for months or even years.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n Once the government has investigated the claims, it may choose to:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n For more information see our Issue Brief: False Claims Act Lawsuits: What Nonprofits Need to Know<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n The specific allegations of material support in TZAC\u2019s complaint<\/a> are centered around speech-related activities: a May 2015 meeting in Ramallah and various other \u201cmeetings, workshops, round-table discussions and private consultations.\u201d<\/p>\r\n At the Ramallah meeting the Carter Center hosted representatives of various Palestinian political parties, including Hamas and the PFLP, at its facility. A picture from the meeting included in the complaint shows water bottles, fruit and cookies at the meeting table. TZAC alleges the meeting constituted prohibited material support of terrorism because:<\/p>\r\n In addition, the complaint said that the Carter Center sponsors \u201cmeetings, workshops, round-table discussions and private consultations to promote dialogue and discussions among Palestinian factions (including terrorist organizations) with the aim of promoting electoral consensus and general reconciliation.\u201d TZAC says such meetings are inconsistent with the Supreme Court\u2019s 2010 decision in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, which said Congress can prohibit services and technical advice and assistance as material support of terrorism, even when it is intended to reduce conflict. TZAC\u2019s complaint said in May 2011 the Carter Center and its local partner, the Arab Thought Forum, organized a meeting that included representatives of Hamas and PFLP, \u201cto assist various Palestinian factions in developing a new electoral code.\u201d TZAC claimed such meetings constitute material support because:<\/p>\r\n The complaint also lists several such meetings that took place before the Supreme Court decision, a period when the lower courts had found application of the material support prohibition to such activities to be unconstitutionally vague and broad.<\/p>\r\n DOJ moved to dismiss<\/a> the case in November 2017. It points out that TZAC did not allege that the Carter Center concealed its activities or failed to meet its obligations under the USAID grants. That same month TZAC filed a motion to unseal<\/a> the case and open the hearing on the government\u2019s motion to dismiss to the public. It cited provisions of the FCA that provide for a hearing when the government has moved to dismiss, to enable the party bringing the action (relator) to \u201censure that the government has a complete and accurate understanding of the full picture of the case\u201d in making its decision to proceed or not. On Jan. 9, 2018 the court granted the motion for a public hearing and unsealed the complaint, motion to dismiss and motion to unseal the case. However other documents filed prior to its order remained sealed.<\/p>\r\n A hearing set for April 24 was cancelled when TZAC opted to instead meet with DOJ informally in an attempt to change the agency\u2019s position. DOJ filed a notice<\/a> with the court on May 31 saying it had conducted a \u201cdiligent investigation\u201d of the facts and the meeting with TZAC had not changed its position. DOJ\u2019s response is notable for two reasons:<\/p>\r\n In the DC Circuit the government has full discretion on whether or not to pursue False Claims Act cases, so on May 31 the court entered a final and appealable order dismissing the case<\/a>. TZAC issued a statement<\/a> saying that while it disagrees with the outcome \u201cthere is not much to do about it\u201d and that it will \u201ccontinue investigating the Carter Center.\u201d<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In this False Claims Act lawsuit, the Zionist Advocacy Center alleged that the Carter Center provided material support to terrorist groups, contrary to its USAID certification, when it included Hamas and the Popular Front for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\r\n\r\n\r\nCase Summary<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
False Claims Act Basics<\/span><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\n
Allegations in the Complaint<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
DOJ\u2019s Motion to Dismiss and Unsealing the Case<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n