{"id":3469,"date":"2013-11-07T05:41:38","date_gmt":"2013-11-07T10:41:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/?p=3469"},"modified":"2019-10-09T07:04:15","modified_gmt":"2019-10-09T11:04:15","slug":"motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/","title":{"rendered":"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A new attorney for the individual defendants in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) criminal case<a href=\"\/sites\/default\/files\/HLF-Joint-Memo-in-Support-of-2255-Motion.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u00a0filed a motion to vacate\u00a0<\/a>their sentences in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on Oct. 25, 2013. It argues that the defendants received inadequate assistance of counsel in the trial and on appeal, that the evidence did not show that Hamas controlled the zakat (charity) committees HLF funded and that the government not only failed to turn over evidence that would have been helpful to the defense, but pursued the prosecution based on the defendants\u2019 religious identity.\u00a0 The motion does not seek to overturn the conviction of HLF as a charitable entity, which was convicted at trial without anyone appearing on its behalf.\u00a0 An evidentiary hearing is requested.<\/p>\n<p>Background on the HLF criminal case is\u00a0<a href=\"\/material-support\/hlf_summary\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here.<\/a>\u00a0 It was the largest Islamic charity in the U.S. until it was shut down three months after 9\/11. HLF had been legally operating for over a decade before its designation and closure. Its former officials were convicted of providing material support for terrorism on retrial in November 2008, and received sentences ranging from 15 to 65 years.\u00a0 The motion is based on\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/28\/2255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">28 USC 2255<\/a>\u00a0which permits a federal prisoner to claim \u201cthe right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States\u2026\u201d\u00a0 The Supreme Court\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.charityandsecurity.org\/news\/Top_Court_Not_Hear_Appeal_Holy_Land_Foundation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">denied<\/a>\u00a0the defendant\u2019s request for review on Oct. 29, 2012.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#1\"><strong>Lack of Evidence: Zakat Committees and Hamas<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/Motion_To_Vacate_Senteces_HLF#2\"><strong>Entrapment: Zakat Committees Not on Terrorist List<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#3\"><strong>Prosecution Failure to Turn Over Exculpatory Evidence<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Selective Enforcement<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"1\" name=\"1\"><\/a><strong>Lack of Evidence: Zakat Committees and Hamas<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The ineffective assistance of counsel argument stresses that a central issue in the case was whether or not the zakat committees HLF funded were controlled by Hamas and if so, that the defendants were aware of that fact.\u00a0 (Because Hamas is listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, the material support prohibition applies to any entity it controls.)\u00a0 The motion points out that the defense attorneys:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Did not challenge the government\u2019s expert witnesses, who made conclusions about Hamas control but did not offer factual basis for them.<\/li>\n<li>Did not call a key witness in the second trial, which resulted in convictions, that was called in the first trial, which resulted in a hung jury. This was Prof. Nathan Brown of George Washington University\u2019s Political Science and International Affairs Department, who had conducted extensive research on zakat committees and had visited one of those at issue in the case.\u00a0 In the first trial he testified he found nothing to indicate it was controlled by Hamas.<\/li>\n<li>Did not call officials of the zakat committees to provide evidence.\u00a0 The motion included several affidavits from such officials stating that Hamas does not control them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The motion said in the trial that \u201cneither side called any witnesses who were on the Zakat Committees, worked at the Committees or had any personal business transactions with the Committees.\u00a0 Thus, there was no evidence at all as to how the Zakat Committees operated, how decisions were made, how they received and distributed aid or who actually controlled or directed the activities of the Committees.\u201d [p. 31]<\/p>\n<p>The motion reviews some of the expert witness statements that some members of the Zakat committees were members of Hamas. In response, the motion notes:<\/p>\n<p class=\"rteindent1\">\u201cAn examination of the evidence, with a proper application of the law, will show that Hamas did not control these committees any more than the fact that a person is a member of the Republican party, and is an officer of Walmart, means that the Republican party controls Walmart.\u00a0 The evidence simply shows that Zakat Committees were composed of community leaders, some of whom were Hamas sympathizers and some of whom were not.\u201d [p. 36]<\/p>\n<p><a id=\"2\" name=\"2\"><\/a><strong>Entrapment: Zakat Committees Not on Terrorist List<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The defendants\u2019 motion argues that the defense attorneys should have pursued an entrapment defense because the Treasury Department rejected the defendants\u2019 request for guidance after Hamas was listed and the Zakat committees they funded were never put on the terrorist list.<\/p>\n<p>Citing case law that says entrapment occurs when the government causes an offense by someone not ready or having intent to commit a crime, the motion provides details of the defendants\u2019 various attempts to communicate with the government about their work after Hamas was put on the terrorist list in 1995. This includes a phone call between two defendants that was taped by the government. [p. 18-20] The motion says \u201cThe facts establish that the HLF defendants were attempting to comply with the law and that the government deliberately misled them into thinking they were doing so. This demonstrates that no offense would have been committed except for the government\u2019s conduct.\u201d [p. 20]<\/p>\n<p><a id=\"3\" name=\"3\"><\/a><strong>Prosecution Failure to Turn Over Exculpatory Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>After noting the long-standing legal principle that the government must turn over evidence in its possession that may be beneficial to the defense (from the Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland), the motion says \u201cThere is no question that the government had within its possession and control exculpatory evidence that was not turned over to the defense.\u201d Two categories are cited: records of defendants\u2019 phone conversations intercepted by the government and material in a warehouse in Israel that was seized from the Zakat committee offices.<\/p>\n<p>The taped phone calls would indicate defendants\u2019 \u201cdesire to follow the law and a belief that they are following the law.\u201d It would also have shown that material from the offices included a picture of Yasser Arafat and other Fatah material, showing \u201cthat Hamas does not control the committees since Fatah and Arafat are enemies of Hamas.\u201d [p. 53]<\/p>\n<p><a id=\"4\" name=\"4\"><\/a><strong>Selective Enforcement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The motion states that the case was prosecuted \u201cfor improper purposes resulting in a denial of due process and equal protection.\u201d [p. 55]\u00a0 The reason for the prosecution was that the defendants are Muslim. It says that \u201cThe United States government has made policy decisions to ignore and not prosecute similar conduct by non-Muslims.\u00a0 The prosecution in this case was motivated by a discriminatory purpose and had a discriminating effect.\u201d [p. 56]<\/p>\n<p>The exhibits supporting the motion can be found<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mlfa.org\/hlf-2255-motion-vacate-update\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u00a0here.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new attorney for the individual defendants in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) criminal case\u00a0filed a motion to vacate\u00a0their sentences in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on Oct. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A new attorney for the individual defendants in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) criminal case\u00a0filed a motion to vacate\u00a0their sentences in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on Oct. [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Charity &amp; Security Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-11-07T10:41:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-09T11:04:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Charity-and-Security\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Charity-and-Security\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/\",\"name\":\"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-11-07T10:41:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-09T11:04:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f65e45656d792d5ad09e802f05c0f881\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/\",\"name\":\"Charity &amp; Security Network\",\"description\":\"Just another WordPress site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f65e45656d792d5ad09e802f05c0f881\",\"name\":\"Charity-and-Security\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bcd0bb7c03e07ce207a7a6553d14be04?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bcd0bb7c03e07ce207a7a6553d14be04?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Charity-and-Security\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/author\/charity-and-security\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network","og_description":"A new attorney for the individual defendants in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) criminal case\u00a0filed a motion to vacate\u00a0their sentences in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on Oct. [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/","og_site_name":"Charity &amp; Security Network","article_published_time":"2013-11-07T10:41:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-09T11:04:15+00:00","author":"Charity-and-Security","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Charity-and-Security","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/","url":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/","name":"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion - Charity &amp; Security Network","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-11-07T10:41:38+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-09T11:04:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f65e45656d792d5ad09e802f05c0f881"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/litigation\/motion_to_vacate_senteces_hlf\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Leaders Ask Court to Vacate Sentences, HLF Not Included in Motion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/","name":"Charity &amp; Security Network","description":"Just another WordPress site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f65e45656d792d5ad09e802f05c0f881","name":"Charity-and-Security","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bcd0bb7c03e07ce207a7a6553d14be04?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bcd0bb7c03e07ce207a7a6553d14be04?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Charity-and-Security"},"url":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/author\/charity-and-security\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charityandsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}